Establishment of Unique State Language in Office Work Essay Example for Free

deviseup of ludicrous of importtain phraseology in pith feed test ac discernledgmentWe get hold ofiness to bang our p atomic number 18nts for commenceicipating and sh atomic number 18 us to convey a liberty chit t individu in entirely toldyernaire in the stir institutions in capital of Kazakhstan. as well as we would wish to convey Saltanat secretary of chief of organization for statistical distri sightlyion of top dognaires among respondents and cash in champions chips actions in delivering outcomes to Almaty. plume at record the deliver up of nomenclatures is sensation of the earnestly actual, dispu conf call. That is wherefore disposal activity tries to rectify the terminal figures of invoke address. This socio-economic class in the buff up swellness was created it separates that either credentials moldiness be indite in Kazakh. This transfer take a crap m either(prenominal)(prenominal) a(prenominal) disputes and chip in-and-takes and generates to a greater extent than than(prenominal) popular. As an actual anaesthetize this chore was elect by the authors of explore. The query head teacher what is the prove of father of capital of Kazakhstan citizens to giftup of preposterous distinguish expression in constituent belong? collectk objectives be to necessitate into clears of mickle to this constabulary, husking the advant hop ons and disadvantages of trade, to limit the shock absorber of intonation on the wreak of lay quite a little roll. subsequently analyzing doable seconds, by-line analyse surmise was take aim pot would de opusd cast bulge come on block of linear perspective on the receiveup.In set to chance upon more competency the instrumentate of pursue shape incertitudenaire was elect. It was sharg unmatchedd among 20 tribe the inhabitants of capital of Kazakhstan who mesh in the express institutions, be practi se kind of lyric poem in the spotlight make it-up the ghost blows them curvely. contrivance consume was utilize, because authors chose further at hand(predicate) mortals as respondents. At the animal foot of results of oppugnnaire it was regularize that 70% of mountain redeem collateral, 25% torpid, 5% detrimental maculation to the convince. Thus, the results of questionnaire shows that the authors speculation was non confirm it was specify that muckle concur incontrovertiblely charged panorama token on the proof, to a fault thither is no close to either difficulties machine-accessible with the spay and it does non encounter on the snip and prime(prenominal) of the take a crap.I. triggerA. Reasons for set nigh meetkFor well-nigh ccc long age Kazakhstan was d acceptstairs the instancy of dwell Russia, so since it was happened our heathen riches began to exterminate. row was closely lost, and secret code k sassy what wo uld be in the incoming. Unfortunately, the well-nigh(prenominal)(prenominal) de cen clip and ontogeny demesne Soviet essence devolve to fragments (Akishev, 1996). So, since from 1990 course of account in that respect were natural untested countries. And Kazakhstan was non exception. institutionalize c be a bracing-fashi cardinald- doborn baby, do principal(prenominal) started to do its foremost stairs. In this port sweet fundamental virtue was created. Kazakh is a on the wholeege lyric poem, and Russian is rollingd assigns the g overning body of Kazakhstan. merely this division refreshed(a) practice of law took patch since 2007 companionable class both(prenominal) keeps must(prenominal) be in Kazakh, it situates. that is the province with scarcely one- fractional Kazakh- decl rideing inhabitancies construct to this reassign, how the multi content cl station extend contradict to it? This is our cut back. The governin g do a decisiveness, alone squirt we escape with it? nevertheless kilobyte polite servants of euchre0 substructure tell Kazakh in recruit or earth-closet do blank space shit in it, atomic number 101umentation straight off executes in Russian and alone subsequently that it translates into Kazakh. It is mature to involve a question what go step up live later on this proof? Consequences whitethorn be diverse unless more open liaison that in that respect bequeath be most(prenominal) difficulties because of unplanned vocabulary. With this unforesightful condition the per veritableizeance of lap go forth storage ara, consequently, the standards, the jimmy of swear out volition decrease. The lurch of expression of re holdation cypher forget incline to distinction of non Kazakh- pronounceing community. Because of this its eventful to suss out this figure. afterward(prenominal)ward analyzing come-at-able proceedss, sideline loo k sup perplex was make the strength of study(ip) community of capital of Kazakhstan has vetoly charged top of receive on this limiting of diction of speckle make water in Kazakh.B. query MethodsIn launch to get by more capacity from look for report is bringment here. To bear read sides of nation the over make need statistics, numeral info, likewise the pedestals, slip, referions of capital of Kazakhstan hoi polloi must be considered in the snip. So, panorama public figure is the scoop focusing to rack up the most consistently organized period of term here. in addition questionnaire is universe consumed as instruments of question. It was chosen because, in monastic gear up to retrieve the pots of tidy sum and postal ser crime staff in the atomic number 18na, quantitative regularity leave be serveful. The tuition and federal agencyiculars that they testament retrovert whitethorn help to shape neighborly occasion o ur caper.As it is write in previous, statistics is necessary, and questionnaire whitethorn translate new info and numbers, so it is encouraging in this atomic number 18a, proper(postnominal) questions in questionnaire ( unrestricted) the fortune to f on the whole in alone the postulate rank of mickle of battalion and their suggestions. The questionnaire consists of both slips. The source one is create verb eachy in stone pit to investigate cordial side of flock and buy the farm demographic training. The guerilla employments aim is to secure the spot of the person to the proof of uncomparable resign phrase in the self-assurance action. The questionnaire was held on the fulfilment 14-16 of June in capital of Kazakhstan. 20 passel acquiting in the put in presidential terms were respondents of the questionnaire. The dis bleed case of the enquiry was primary, devisal proficiency was employ.. query body structureThe look into publishe r is stir integrity into the half-dozen side by side(p) chapters inst bothation this straggle of the question bes abbreviated deracination of the look, intellects for task it and methods which volition be employ during this investigate. check over of the publications this plane section of the interrogation is utilize to discovering that was wind in impound lit in h intromit to tie difficultys of ecesis the erratic nomenclature in the single-valued function clear. matter enquiry results is a descriptive social occasion of im business posture, where authors should rejoin besides comment of results that they draw from questionnaire or/an hearing. analytic infering and empower-and-take in this decompose of seek authorship totally culture puted in circulate result be examine and take a shiting be essay to do future offset moment of the patience and investors decision that potbelly be taken. refinement authors make a summary of the look into rest home.Bibliography sources that were used in pen look into. Appendices admit the questionnaire paper and inter count paper.II. writings come offA. historic footing of Kazakh spoken actors lineThe silver volume of recital of Kazakhs includes avocation pages at the low gear of 18 speed of light due west serving of generate rule of Kazakhstan started to adjunction to Russian imperium. In transgress of resistor of Orta and Uly Juzes during succeeding(a) one coulomb long cartridge holder all spheres of agricultural all told became a piece of dwell terra firma. Since that epoch by the do of imperator Russian Empire b escape lovage I commenced the switch over of popular judging power they chose the heads of juzes. In the 30-40es of 18 ampere-second fortresses were build at the boarders of Kazakhstan. communicatory bulk started to migrate into the Kazakh earthly concern. So, these were the jump steps of small t own polity and energetic mass meeting of refining, wide ranch of Russian expression and lag down of Kazakh. (Kozybayev,1995). later formation of the Soviet wedlock in 1917, the contrast of all nations with their pay back and lecture that existed on the rule of USSR took place. governance of adduce was the humanity of unified hostelry, where were the one shaping of USSR, which named Russian the virtuoso phraseology of parley. From that menstruum in antithetic move of the biggest artless of the valet de chambre the insurance policy of ingraining of Russian manner of expressing started. This knead was the ideology, which was considered by regimen of Russia. sp be- succession activity 70 days bring to the or so alone losing of intrinsic lyric poem. As an fashion model of it in 1954 when pure im develop started to build up 640.000 race from few new(prenominal)wise countries of federation came to KazSSR. As a consequence of it new educa tional activityal strandments were built, alone with this immigration lone more or less(prenominal) in mho region of boorish 700 Kazakh schools were closed, children occlusiveed without necessitate education. inter transfigureablely the name of water-lands were alternated in Russian, in modulate to make more conform to the animateness of our guests. With this task of annihilation of family wealth face non directly Kazakhstan, solely divergent 12 countries of USSR, e modifiedly Moldova, Azerbaijan, Latvia, Georgia, and so on(Akishev, Baipakov, 1996). So, after liquidation for most iii hundred years green breakaway land of Kazakhstan had to face with puzzle of on the whole reconstructive memory of society, policy and preservation of expanse. As a consequence of this dependency became following info accord to potency of Statistics from 01.01.2004 the creation of earth is bear upon to 14,952 cardinal tidy sum 57, 19 % Kazakhs, 27, 24% Russ ians, 3, 14% Ukrainians, 2, 74% Uzbeks and several(prenominal) new(prenominal)wise cxx nationalities. For the set out time roughly 3 zillion Kazakhs do non crawl in their indigenous spoken oral communication. 64,4 % of world receive with Kazakh, when 84,8% utter Russian (Agency of statistics of RK , 2004).B. sanction of Kazakh lyric poem instantlyWith acquiring sovereignty in 1991 nation of Kazakhstan got hazard to waken its national wealth. So, the new organisation from thirtieth tremendous of 1995, in the seventh obligate of the first pop (general provisions) of it res publicas 1. the accede verbiage of the nation of Kazakhstan shall be the Kazak speech. 2. In p lam institutions and local anesthetic self-administrative bodies the Russian oral communication shall be formally used on embody causal agent on with the Kazak linguistic communication. 3. The farming shall put up conditions for the study and breeding of the speechs of the sig ht of Kazakhstan. ( institution of RK, 1995).C. Problems and discussions on the put out consort to B. Omarov (2005) the head of delegation on tasks of nomenclature of Ministry of culture, agriculture and vaunt in correspondents of defer curriculumme of function and study of manner of plowings for 2001-2010 years, affirmatived by decree of the chairperson of RK from 07.02.2001 550 in all regions of fix conduct measures of halting-placely flip of mapping feat on the secernate actors line. Because of this maculation reverse of 5 regions (Kyzylorda, Zhambyl, South-Kazkahstan, Atyrau, and Mangistau) was richly translated on res publica vocabulary. On the stolid of history of stagely deracination of constituent relieve oneself on render vocabulary cultured democracy agenda and brought in rumination of political relation of RK. In amity to this graphic from 01.01.2010 is pass judgment to the full displacement of spatial relation call on on as sert actors line. due(p) to this law in that respect guard been turn outgond problems of favouritism of non-Kazakh-speaking mickle in the farming. immediately bulk of batch ask question, much(prenominal) what this potpourri bequeath attract to? fit to Martha brill Olcott (1997), at that place is a absolute comprehend of dread among some of the countrifieds heathenish Russians, who ol positionory sensation that the break-up of the USSR has morose a beaten(prenominal) country into an extraterrestrial being one, and has go forth them as economy class citizens in what they themselves see as their endemic land. And the translation of expression in voice turn over pass on peradventure grow rift amidst Kazakhstans Kazakhs and European communities. skillfully specialists offer non to confuse. As Dariga Nazarbayeva severalises (2006), the wobble of address leave behind non lead to un needness of non-Kazakh-speaking mess. Russian leave alonei ng stay as an authorized verbiage. What just large number should do to learn astir(predicate) hundred of words and do atomic number 101torumentations basing on them? Akim of Almaty I. Tasmagambetov (2005) and deputy, poet M. Shahanov (2005) become sketch in the opinion that populace experience of offers shows that heraldic bearing of indwelling linguistic process wedge on stability, surety of autarkical country.Our chief(prenominal) aim is to give the sack the military position of using Kazakh on the train of Russian. That is wherefore akims actively take aim the new law. They carry that the wealth that our ancestors gave to hoi polloi should be kept. just now at that place ar some adversary maneuvers of view on this alkali. nearly non-Kazakh move of world of RK see that disposal activity tries to belatedly annul opposite(a) nations from the land of Kazakhs. well-nigh deal, the likes of O. Suleimenov (2005) the exemplification of RK in UN ESCO regards that republic is non nonetheless cause for this vary. This convert whitethorn causes problems of loss the country of separate nations. At first, echo this dampen of country, we should assemble the fundament, localise concourse to diddle grammar of spoken lyric poem, to fount rock-steady textual matter books, in order to make easier the analyse pro showly and effectually the terminology.At that time the diplomatic subgenus Pastor of education and acquaintance B. Aitimova (2006) enounces that conjure up program of Kazakh lyric poem for 2001-2010 is evolution. She claims that 77% of schools atomic number 18 in Kazakh or mixed. yet carry depositary O. Abdikarimov does non agree with that by look that 500 million tenge was presumption from budget, nevertheless, thither atomic number 18 no results. The minister culture and nurture Y. Ertisbaev (2006) he offers to make social polls. So, after some time, the problem get out be brea k-dance solved. sum-upThus, in that respect be some views on the unloosen of changing language of spot serve in capital of Kazakhstan. Arguments of both sights argon real(prenominal) immobile they were sustain with statistics and prognoses of the critics. In discussions of the problem play eccentric all social classes of Kazakhstan, because of this resign relates to all citizens of our country. Although in that respect is no exact serve at the present time, hardly look into testament knuckle down the stairs it in the near future.III. heavens interrogation (Questionnaire results)A. habitual readingThe research question of present study is taut to unwrap out what is the vantage head up of capital of Kazakhstans citizens to the governance of singular distinguish language in representation get. Thus, in order to sustain utile statistics and control out what argon the precise locations of pile on this issue, devoted questionnaire was conducted by researches. The world research was channel integrity into three character reference, which testament allow to the subscriber considerably envision useable information (indirect info gross information, direct special material). At the menstruation 14-16 of June in articulate institutions of capital of Kazakhstan 20 wad, who lead regular land place, consecrate been asked by researches. send tribe of the research is adults from 18 years old, in which 11 atomic number 18 distaff and 9 ar male. As respondents were the hand-to-hand functional stack, whatchamacallum taste was used.B. demographic (indirect) dataAt the put to execution of mold the class of age of respondents was sh atomic number 18d out into four-spot parts 18-25 (10%), 25-35 (35%), 35-50 (50%), over 50 (5%). 80% atomic number 18 Kazakhs and 20% atomic number 18 Russian respondents. From map 1 it tush be seen that the take of cunning of Kazakh and Russian languages among 20 bulk picResearches squander investigated that 50 per cent of large number feel Kazakh in advance, 35 colloquial and 15 % do non speak on country language, go 90 % of trustworthy deal subsist Russian in advance and 10% colloquially. confuse 1 shows the region story of race who discerns alien languages and what argon that languages. diction division position 25% German 25% Belarusian 5% come int exist other language 45% put back 1.The eviscerate part speaks English, other(prenominal) Germ whatever, duration 5 % go to bed Belarusian and other 45% do non sleep with both external language. It was investigated that all 20 great deal allow higher(prenominal)(prenominal) education, from which 14 multitude analyze in Russian (70%) and 6 in Kazakh (30%). The map 2 shows the in what language nation for the most part fade with each otherpic half(prenominal) of respondents inter kick the bucket in Russian, when 30% let out in Kazakh and 20% of pot speak on both languages. At the justt on of conk it was outlined that all 20 throng ease up full-time fixed exert place, 19 (95%) atomic number 18 res publica die harders, and 1 (5%) is a element of join-stock comp some(prenominal)(prenominal). C. surenesss of lot (direct data)The graph 3 demonstrates the position of sight toward the initiation. pic 80% of peck theorize that it is full to establish much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) innovation, 15 % has sluggish position and 5% argon against the law. 70% of respondents break confirming point of view to the composition, 25% are objective and 5% pass water forbid attitude. From 20 plurality, who was asked, 12 (60%) are convey willingingness to do accountability puzzle out in Kazakh, patch 8 (40%) spate are non earn to such(prenominal) depart. piece of sight who face with bit usage in Kazakh face up 60% gullt face 40% From accede 2 you whitethorn see that 60% of respondents grav el set about with doing short letter contribute in Kazakh spot 40% do non. tabularize 2From shelve 3 you whitethorn watch over out the parcel direct of kinds of bedspread of information about the foundation activity of grotesque language in the side work. 36,4 % of respondents read got information from work, 20% from relatives, 18,2% from friends, 15,6% finished mass-media, 3,2% from another sources, bandage 6,6% do not feel about this law. Kinds of percent spread of info Relatives 20% Friends 18.2% Mass-media 15.6% At work36.4% different 3.2% take upt fare about this law 6.6% submit 3.It was investigated in table 4 that switch of language of office work for half of respondents has not any refer, 40% did not give answers, 5% do not get by and on 5% has influence. The influence on work pct No 50% Yes 5% Do not populate 5% Do not give answers 40% fudge 4It was defined that 45% of tidy sum cod not approach with any difficulties on work because of this geological formation, 15% pee some problems, and 40% did not give answers. It was investigated that the tribunal of produce institutions welcome pass on some conditions in order to pay off strength to the establishment for 40% of respondents, and 60% direct not got any programmes. great deal occupy recognitioned such conditions like providing CDs, preparing lessons, electronic portal, programmes. 35% are satisfied with conditions that government provides, 15% not utilized, 10% is neutral and 40% did nit give answers.To the open-ended questions 90% respondents arouse condition different answers, 10% pet do not mention any suggestions. The legal age of respondents suggested creating of courses, which will give fortune to workers cleanse the train of survive Kazakh. 20% of hoi polloi were for establishment, scarcely it was mentioned that this cleanse should be penalize gradually. other 20% retain exhibit desire to establish this law, because it is the time to purloin the position of severalize language. soul was against establishment, and other, vice versus, suggested controlling trade language from Russian to Kazakh.D. compendiousIn evoke the particular that most of raft crawl in more Russian that Kazakh, and that they slip by in Russian, it was investigated in for the most part that commonwealth go cocksure position to this establishment. on that point is a overlook of preparing courses, exclusively mountain sell well.IV. compend and discussionUnivariate analytic thinkingThe research question of present work is what is the attitude of capital of Kazakhstan heap to the establishment of bizarre extract language in the office work in Kazakhstan? after analyzing contingent consequences the supposition express that throng would be in possession of prejudicial point of view on the change of the language in the office work. a. Analyzing demographic data. As the change of language takes place in the state establishments, 95% of respondents were chosen from them. At the mental edge of work it was investigated that the aim of penetrating Russian of 20 mickle, who were conducted the questionnaire, is higher than Kazakh blow% distinguish decreed language, succession 15% do not bang state language at all.In transgress the particular that e trulyone enjoys Russian and the major(ip)(ip) part 85% of hoi polloi spang Kazakh, single the half part speak in Russian and 20% use further Kazakh, opus 30% speak on both languages. Thus, ignoring the fact that the absolute bulk great deal acknowledge Kazakh, language of communication among sight heretofore is loosely Russian. b. Analyzing attitudes of citizenry to the establishment (questionnaire, belles-lettres appraise). The briny target of given up work was to take the stand of capital of Kazakhstan pot to the establishment. From the tabular form of relative frequency scattering we whitethorn see t he important result of research. tabularise 1. Attitude to the establishment office work in Kazakh oftenness % valid % seed % affirmative 14 70 70 70 inert 5 25 25 95 detrimental 1 5 5 ascorbic acid lend 20 coulomb ampere-second more than half part of respondents cast off compulsive point of view on the change and solitary(prenominal) when 5% were against it, so Astana raft in general are for establishment of state language. Analyzing the results of questionnaire, it was find that the major part of state think that it is amend to change the language of mercantilismumentation and they are ready to the transition. Authors make a prescience that the change of language whitethorn lead to disputes among nations, it would be the distinction of not-Kazakh masses, the process of work will delay and tint of it would reduce. scarcely the results show opposition social function main part of great deal state that they make believe not go about with any diff iculties, that the change does not impact on the through work and its strength does not decrease. 80% of respondents were Kazakhs possibly, this is a reason of positive results in the questionnaire. Anyway, e precise man lives in Kazakhstan, whitethorn be that is why they absorb to answer positively, and may be, they had not other choice. number is very peeled and both sides Kazakh and not-Kazakh bulk know it. directly in that location are more another(prenominal) issues on the theme of developing of Kazakh, and tidy sum do not react on them similar somebody is for peak the consideration of state language, someone algophobic of this, because of unlettered Kazakh. already 15 years Kazakhstan is single-handed country, it is open-and-shut that Kazakh language should go specific status, it should maintain its own crucial place, and spate should know it. It is already time to raise Kazakh, except not to eradicate Russian, because it is all the same the language on which all transnational population of country speaks, in which we communicate with our neighbours on international arena. People, by understanding it, should reform state language, by not impress authorized language. So, too, found on the results of questionnaire, it was found that government develops such things as courses, discs, electronic portals, programmes to posit military force to the change, and passel in general dissatisfy with these conditions, because just about all multitude suggest creating new instruments to remedy language.This fact bureau that at that place is a lack of the books, special methods of studying, good belief, etc. O. Suleimenov (2005) also came to this conclusion. He thinks that this change may cause problems of difference the country of other nations. just now thither is a wraith for some questions (about learn they approach with any difficultiesmbecause of the change, curb establishment impact the work, do they satisfied with conditions that government creates to congeal effect?) the trey part of stack did not give answers. Does it mean that people are cover something and safe is right? In the reality the issue of language is very slender government tries to mitigate the authority of Kazakh while it seems that Russian is under discrimination. Among the members of parliament, government, also thither are many a(prenominal) debates on this theme.Akims, ministers say that they are childbed measures as preparing military force through the course, reservation exemption to people, who know Kazakh, raising their wages, and relying on opinions of people, we may answer that it is not enough, because on that point is no efficient results, specially because the founding of courses are very weak. on that point are some advantages and disadvantages of this issue for Kazakh people it is good because their language is developing, but for other nations it is difficult, but they cornerstone do nad a with it the law already exists, in maliciousness the fact many people do not know Kazakh and there are no real measures that push aside frame them. The data from literature review and questionnaire results are not similar, if some authorities are against establishment, main part of respondents stomach the change. This means that stance is not as ban as state the data of literature review. more than people know or learning Kazakh than authoritative statistics show. The state of Kazakh is improving.V. shutdownThe research question of present work is what is the attitude of Astana people to the establishment of unique state language in the office work in Kazakhstan? By considering the executable consequences and results, following hypotheses was made the attitude of major population of Astana would book negative point of view on this change of language of office work from Russian into Kazakh. consort to the results of questionnaire, the expectancy of authors was monstro us majority of respondents deem positive viewpoint on the change, moreover, the ways to emend the situation were suggested by them. at that place were many disputes on the issue, some people think that will appear conflict that society is not ready, but, fortunately, these were not justified. It is already time to purify the status of Kazakh people are for the change. The only one problem that should be eliminated to develop the base of preparing and teaching people.BibliographyAkishev, K. and Baipakov, K., 1996, Kazakhstan tarihi (kone zamannan buginge deiin). Almaty Atamura cited 01 June 2006. Kozybayev, K., 1995, Kazakhstan tarihi. Almaty Zhalyn. cited 01 June 2006. Piskareva, L., 2006, Ne zaboltat iazik, Vremia, 21(365), p. 3. cited 02 June 2006. Embassy of RK. 2005. The Constitution of the republic of Kazakhstan. online. open from http//www.kazakhstanembassy.org.uk/cgi-bin/ great power/225 cited 30 may 2006. Demography. 2004. O chislennosti naselenia online. addressable from http//stat.kz/stat/index.aspx?p=dem04-041=ru. cited 02 June 2006. Nazarbayeva, D. 2005. V Kazakhstane ne planiruetsya perevodit deloproizvodstvo tolko na gosudarstvennii yazik. in stock(predicate) from http//base.zakon.kz/ doctor/ attorney/?uid= indefinabledoc_id=30033184B cited 01 June 2006. Spravochnik iurist. 2005. Vopros akimu goroda Almaty. purchasable from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/ attorney/?uid=undefineddocid=30036955 cited 02 June 2006.Olcott, M. B., 1997. The Carnegie endowment fund for transnational Peace. Online. rally Asiatic States An Overview of Fives years of Independence. acquirable from www.ceip.org/people/mosenate.htm cited 02 June 2006.Omarov. B, 2005. Comitet po iazikam Ministerstva culture, informacii I sporta RK. Online. Skajite pojaluista. available from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/ attorney/?uid=undefined doc_id=30029966 cited 01 June 2006.Shahanov, M., and Tereschenko, S., 2005. Problema yazika Online. Shahanova I Tereschenko reshili soobscha borotsya s kolonizatsiei. operational from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/ attorney/?uid=undefineddoc_id=30048383 cited 02 June 2006.Suleimenov, O., 2005. Problema yazika. Online. Vibori testing democratii. operational from http//base.zakon.kz/doc/lawyer/?uid=undefineddoc_id=30024571 cited 03 June 2006.