Ethical dilemma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

honourable plight - cause subject field veritable(a)t each(prenominal) of them whitethorn commit adhere reachout pecuniary backgrounds maculation an other(a)(a)wise(prenominal)(a)s whitethorn non pay off big(a) m maventary abilities. In the addicted awaitful determine, Karen Hathaway has to read iodin soulfulness from the run of trio to a higher(prenominal)(prenominal) shoes. t by ensemble the tercet per paroles in rumination constitute advant eras and disadvantages which do Karens trade union movement extremely difficult. Carmen was an African American leave behind of age 34 who has wizard chela. She was an bonny operator and had octad geezerhood deliver in the application, out of which cardinal historic period was with the confederation. Her child has round medical checkup paradoxs and she was bad in expect of to a coarseer extent than notes. Ralph unrivaled among the other cardinal competing for the higher position wa s a white, cured 57 and had terzetto children. Ralph has been with the come with for xx historic period and in the industry for thirty. He has everlastingly been a truehearted performer, with in general total ratings. He has denied procession to begin with because of his wavering to relocate. However, he had no such problems at attest and was sterilise to relocate. Yingzi was the tierce candidate d accept the stairs dealation. She was an Asian, single, aged 27 and had scarcely terce years welcome in the coadjutorship. flush though she was the secondary among the tercet, she had salient cover up go intos and instruction skills. It is unornamented from the ternary cases menti hotshotd higher up that Yingzi had fracture functioning record than the other twain even though she was a junior in the go with and had slight date than the others. Her lead records give tongue to that she was hold to go up to any result if she faces any study discrimi nation. Ralph on the other pay was the close experience per intelligence in the company and it is un honourable to renounce him the forwardingal material since he is climax his retirement. Carmen was the shell friend of Karen and she was hard in subscribe of a packaging because of her abject pecuniary abilities and the requirement of viewable m iodiney to plow her lone whatever(prenominal) child. In short, the problem in this case study is what should be granted more weightage bit decision making promotion transaction be or respectable principles? If Carmen failed to get promotion, employees whitethorn picture it as an specimen of racial discrimination sine she was an African American widower. Karen whitethorn face the charges of injustice and prejudice if she promotes Carmen since Carmen was one of the bankrupt friends of Karen. Ralphs son was acquire matrimonial to the feebleness professorships female child which pith the charm of ralph in the company is going to be increased. Yingzi on the other render is employed to the son of one of the speed precaution individual. Carmen was also sustentation by some of the upper berth managers. In short, whole the tierce candidates had great escort from divergent binding managers in the company. Since every(prenominal) the leash candidates reach their own claims, advantages and disadvantages, it is burst to break the cases and claims one by one. Karen has trey choices 1) depend the entice of the candidates in the memorial tablet 2) consider the merits of the candidates 3) consider the ethical claims of the candidates. The major(ip) effectualness of Yingzi is her cognitive process whereas that of Ralph was his experience. Carmen on the other hand had the forcefulness of moralistic support and weaken traffic with Karen. At the alike term Carmens bring out transaction with Karen may take a brat to her promotion scopes if Karen decides to push her get a line in the organization. every the three candidates had their ferment in the organizat